The development of the Old High German umlauted vowels and the reflex of New High German /ɛ:/ in Present Standard German

A critical reconstruction of the development of the Old High German umlauted vowels sheds light on the phonological history of various vocalic phonemes and in particular of /ɛ/ and /e/ as well as of /ɛ:/ and /e:/. The changes that affected the two pairs led to different results in the New High German Schriftsprache, in which today’s /ɛ:/ beside /e:/ in words with “long ä” (e. g. spät) is not an artificial vowel based on the spelling, but a historical variant with a phonological history behind it.


2
The subsequent development of the umlauted vowels The changes that modified the Middle High German and (early) New High German vocalic systems obviously affected also the umlauted vowels.
In what follows these changes will be critically discussed with a view to reconstructing the line of development that led to Present Standard German. In this context, due attention will be given to different types of speech, to phonological variants and to relative chronology, but the peculiarities of different areas at different times will be taken into account only where necessary.
3 On the phonemicization of the Old High German umlauted vowels cf. Cercignani (forthcoming The changes affecting the various e-vowels are not always easy to reconstruct (FNHDG: § L 12, 19, 20), but the following is a reasonable explanation of the developments that led to the simplification of the short vowel system, though not invariably to that of the long vowel system.
(A) The first change to be considered here is the raising of /ae/ (the product of the weak i-umlaut of /a/) to /ɛ/ in late Old High German or early Middle High German. This shift of the short vowel resulted in a merger of /ae/, as in MHG geslähte (OHG gislahti) 'Geschlecht', with the reflex of OHG /ɛ/, as in MHG recht (OHG recht) 'Recht'. The raising of /ae/ to /ɛ/ must have occurred after lengthening (chiefly in an open syllable and before /r/ plus consonant), since the lengthened reflex of OHG /ae/ merged only with /ɛ:/ (as in Ähre), whereas the lengthened reflex of OHG /ɛ/ merged with either /ɛ:/ or /e:/ (see 3, below).
The three short e-vowels of the Old High German period were thus reduced to two, until the new /ɛ/ and the pre-existing /e/ (the product of the strong i-umlaut of /a/) merged in a single phoneme, at least in certain types of speech belonging to the Central German and Upper German (East Franconian) areas. As a result of this change words with /ɛ/, such as MHG geslähte, geslehte (OHG gislahti) 'Geschlecht' and MHG recht (OHG recht < *rehta-) 'Recht', as well as words with /e/, such as MHG feste (OHG festi < *fastja-) 'fest', came to exhibit the same phoneme, the antecedent of Present Standard German /ɛ/.
However, in other types of speech belonging to the Upper (but in part also to the Central) German area the distinction between the new /ɛ/ and the older /e/ was preserved at least for some time, so that lengthening resulted in variants with either /ɛ:/ or /e:/. Both types eventually found their way into the New High German "Schriftsprache". Examples: Bär, währen, etc., leben, Wert, etc. (see 3, below). A parallel regional variation came into being as a result of the changes affecting the long vowel /ae:/.
(B) The long vowel /ae:/ (the product of the i-umlaut of /a:/) was similarly raised to /ɛ:/, as in MHG spaete (OHG spāti) 'spät'. Moreover, in certain types of speech belonging to the Central German and Upper German (East Franconian) areas (Reichmann 2000(Reichmann : 1630  However, in other types of speech belonging to the Upper (but in part also to the Central) German area the product of the i-umlaut of /a:/ (as in MHG spaete, OHG spāti 'spät') preserved its identity and the distinction between /ɛ:/ and /e:/ made its way into the New High German "Schriftsprache" as early as the 16th century. This development was certainly encouraged by morphological/etymological considerations (FNHDG: § L 20), but would have been impossible without the linguistic levelling between regional varieties (see 3, below) which led to the coexistence in Present Standard German of words in which MHG /ɛ:/ is represented either by /ɛ:/ (as in zäh) or by /e:/ (as in leer).

The subsequent development of the other umlauted vowels
Most of the changes presented below belong to Middle High German, but those related to the diphthong /iy/ occurred before the end of the Old High German period.
(A) The developments related to the diphthong /iy/ present peculiarities that can be reconstructed chiefly by having recourse to the evidence of modern dialects (cf. Wiesinger 1970: 233f.). Soon after its rise, the phoneme /iy/ generally merged with /y:/ from umlauted /u:/. Before the end of the Old High German period a similar merger affected /iu/ in vast areas of Alemannic and Franconian, whereas in Bavarian, Swabian and southern parts of High Alemannic /iu/ was to a certain extent retained, because in those areas 1) the i-umlaut of /iu/ appears to have occurred only before an intervening dental consonant (as in liuti 'Leute'), and 2) the retained /iu/ did not merge with /y:/, so that a form like diup (Old Franconian diop, MHG diep) 'Dieb' retained a diphthongal pronunciation (MHG diup).
The fact that the above monophthongizations did not result in mergers with the older monophthongs has been explained with the assumption of a lower point of articulation for the new monophthongs (e. In some types of regional speech the products of umlaut were unrounded and some of the new forms found their way into the New High German "Schriftsprache": /y/ > /i/, as in MHG küssen > Kissen; /y:/ > /i:/ (> /ei/), as in MHG spriuzen > spreizen; /øy/ > /ei/, as in MHG slöufe > Schleife.
In other types of regional speech, front vowels were rounded and some of the new "umlauted" forms found their way into the New High German "Schriftsprache": /i/ > /y/, as in MHG finf > fünf; /e/ > /oe/, as in MHG leffel > Löffel and (with lengthening in an open syllable) MHG lewe > Löwe.

3
The reflex of NHG /ɛ:/ in Present Standard German (PSG) Today's /ɛ:/ in words with "long ä" has often been regarded as a problematic vowel. Generally speaking, the distinction between /ɛ:/ and /e:/ is more frequent in the South than in the North. Northern speakers use /ɛ:/ instead of /e:/ only in formal speech and to distinguish such pairs as gebe and gäbe, as well as of course for the name of the letter ⟨ä⟩. Southern speakers normally 15 For lengthening in monosyllables before final /r/ (OHG furi 'für'), before /r/ plus dental (OHG pfarifrit > MHG pfärt 'Pferd'), and in monosyllables with closed syllable on the analogy of inflected forms (MHG tür -türe 'Tür -Türen') cf. Paul/Klein (2007: 82f). 16 Lengthening of short vowels in an open syllable is a peculiarity of both High and Low German dialects (cf. Schirmunski 1962: 183). 17 For a review of the questions related to these changes cf. Penzl (1974: 345-357). 18 Cf. the regional raising of /a:/ to /o:/ accepted in such words as Brodem (OHG brādam), Monat (OHG mānōd), wo (OHG wār), Odem (~ Atem, OHG ātum), etc.
keep /ɛ:/ and /e:/ apart, but the distribution of the two phonemes in regional speech does not always agree with that of Standard German.
The difficulties ascribed to this phoneme are partially due to the circumstance that the triplet /ɛ/ -/ɛ:/ -/e:/ is an exception in the vocalic system of Present Standard German: The preoccupation with symmetry has led to endless discussions on how to interpret this "anomaly", and some scholars have had recourse to apparently decisive solutions. Thus Becker (2012: 38) interprets /ɛ:/ as /ae:/. This is of course quite legitimate, since "long ä" varies between [ɛ:] and [ae:], but the fact remains that /ɛ:/ has no counterpart of its own, since /ɛ/ is also the counterpart of /e:/. 19 Sanders (1972: 58) suggests that /ɛ:/ and /e:/ may be subsumed under a "socio-archiphoneme" /Ē/. But such a solution, though interesting, is of little help when it comes to describing the speech of those who keep /ɛ:/ and /e:/ apart. The fact is that vocalic systems (and phonemic systems in general) cannot be expected to be always symmetric. They should reflect reality, not abstract models.
In other cases, a too rigid interpretation of the development of the German e-vowels has resulted in a substantial exclusion of /ɛ:/ from the phonological history of the German vocalic system. Thus, having considered a single line of development from an undifferentiated East Middle German to a type of New High German similar to today's standard language, Moulton (1961: 34f.) dismissed /ɛ:/ as a spelling-pronunciation vowel with no real history behind it. 20 This view has found numerous followers, Paul/Klein (2007: 64) and Garbe (2000Garbe ( : 1768 among others. The latter states bluntly that /ä/ is diachronically and phonologically unwarranted ("/Ä/ ist diachronisch-phonologisch nicht motiviert"). 19 Cf. Dudenredaktion 2009: 35, where the opposition between "long" and "short" vowels is interpreted as an opposition between "tense" and "lax", so that the triplet in question is presented as /e/ -/ae/ -/ɛ/. 20  Of course, even spelling-pronunciations have their own history and the influence of orthography on pronunciation is a well-known fact. However, things are not as simple as that and the available evidence with regard to /ɛ:/ should be carefully analysed.
The orthography of the Middle and early New High German period is ambiguous and therefore unreliable as evidence of a merger of /ɛ:/ to identity with /e:/. The traditional spelling for /ɛ:/ was ⟨e⟩, while the ligature ⟨ae⟩ and the combined digraph ⟨a ͤ ⟩ occurred only in Bavarian and East Alemannic manuscripts (cf. Paul/Klein 2007: 97).
Rhymes cannot be used to ascertain generalized mergers. If corroborated by other evidence, they may at most reflect a merger in specific types of speech, provided that due regard is given to traditional and inexact rhymes. Moreover, poets may be inclined to rely on variant pronunciations if they find them useful for their rhymes.
Etymology is on the other hand reliable in most cases and can contribute to explain the present distribution of /ɛ:/ ("long ä") and /e:/ ("long e"). A useful analysis of the available material should carefully distinguish instances in which the relevant vowel is the result of phonological changes from forms in which it is analogical, as well as from ambiguous and therefore inconclusive cases.
continues as PSG /e:/ (as in Zeh, mehr, Ehre). However, in other types of speech belonging to the Upper (but in part also to the Central) German area MHG /ɛ:/ from OHG /ae:/ has been preserved to the present day as /ɛ:/, which varies phonetically between [ɛ:] and [ae:] (as in zäh, Mär) -cf. 2.1 above.
The lengthened reflex of OHG /e/ merged with /e:/ (as in Beere, wehren), but the lengthening of OHG /ae/ and /ɛ/ occurred at different times and/or in different types of speech: -the lengthened reflex of OHG /ae/ merged only with /ɛ:/ (as in Ähre), a change that may be assumed to have occurred before the raising of /ae/ to /ɛ/; -the lengthened reflex of OHG /ɛ/ merged with /ɛ:/ in certain types of speech belonging to the Central German and Upper German (East Franconian) areas; this change must have occurred before the merger of /ɛ/ and /e/. Examples: Bär, währen, etc. But in other types of speech belonging to the Upper (but in part also to the Central) German area the lengthened reflex of OHG /ɛ/ merged with /e:/; this change must have occurred after the merger of /ɛ/ and /e/. Examples: leben, Wert, etc. -cf. 2.1 above.
The above analysis based on etymological criteria allows us to arrive at two conclusions. The first is that the coalescence of /ae/, /ɛ/, and /e/ took place at different times and/or in different types of speech in late Old or early Middle High German. Further, that the reduced incidence of /ɛ/ and /e/ caused by lengthening (chiefly in an open syllable and before /r/ plus consonant) favoured the subsequent merger of /e/ and /ɛ/. The resulting /ɛ/ was then accepted by the New High German "Schriftsprache" and eventually preserved by Present Standard German. Examples with older /ae/, /ɛ/, and /e/ are Geschlecht (OHG gislahti, MHG geslehte, geslähte), Recht (OHG recht, MHG recht), and fest (OHG festi, MHG feste).
The second conclusion is that the merger of /ɛ:/ and /e:/ was by no means generalized, so that /ɛ:/ preserved its identity, at least in certain types of regional speech. This is indicated by the following considerations: -Words like Mär, säen, träge, zäh can be shown to exhibit a phonologically developed /ɛ:/. 29 -OHG MHG /e:/ has never become /ɛ:/ (cf. Hinderling 1978: 38). Examples: Ehre, mehr, See, Zeh[e], etc. -No analogical formations like (du) färst (MHG ferest), Hähne (MHG hanen), etc. would have been possible without the existence of a phoneme /ɛ:/ in the types of speech in which they were created. The morphologization of umlaut may occur also in the pre-literary stages of a language and is attested also in recent dialects, 30 where it cannot be explained by having recourse to the influence of the orthography.
These conclusions are to a certain extent corroborated by the dialectal evidence presented and discussed by Hinderling (1978: esp. 42-61), who argues that the various reflexes of the evowels in recent dialects suggest that the development of NHG /ɛ:/ belongs to historical phonology and not merely to historical orthography. 29 Sanders (1972: 44f.) rightly observes that analogy cannot be invoked for such instances as Märchen, dim. of Mär (OHG māri, MHG maere) and Mähre (OHG mariha, MHG märhe), since no related forms with /a:/ can be found. 30 For the morphologization of umlaut in recent German dialects cf. Hinderling (1978: 42-61).
To assume that /ɛ:/ simply merged with /e:/ in all the types of speech that contributed to the formation of the New High German "Schriftsprache" amounts to ignoring the etymological evidence and to forgetting that the transition from Middle to New High German was a complex process involving phonological compromises between different regional features, in our case between Low and Central German /e:/ and Central and Upper German /ɛ:/. 31 True, the acceptance of the distinction between the two phonemes in general usage was certainly encouraged by morphological/etymological considerations which led to the use of ⟨ä⟩ (and consequently of /ɛ:/) in words with original /e:/ (as in zählen, MHG zelen) and forms with earlier /a:/ (as in Hähne, MHG hanen). But the fact that these modifications were due to prescriptive tendencies promoted by grammarians, printers, and linguistic societies does not imply that the distinction between /ɛ:/ and /e:/ was invented, since it occurred in regional types of speech that made their way into the New High German "Schriftsprache".
A possible objection to the acceptance of the phoneme /ɛ:/ as resulting from phonological developments is that recent dialects which preserve the distinction between /ɛ:/ and /e:/ do not agree with standard usage with regard to the distribution of the two phonemes. But the fact that Central and Upper German areas may have, for example, /ɛ:/ in leben but /e:/ in heben and legen can only confirm the phonological origin of /ɛ:/ as opposed to /e:/. In these types of speech OHG /ɛ/ with subsequent lengthening (OHG lebēn, weban) merged with /ɛ:/ -whereas in others it merged with /e:/ (cf. above) -and this phoneme was kept apart from /e:/ derived from OHG /e/ with subsequent lengthening (MHG heben, OHG heffen; OHG legen < *lagjan). Regional usage cannot be expected to agree with standard usage, which is often the result of a complex process of linguistic levelling.
Another possible objection to the acceptance of the phoneme /ɛ:/ as resulting from phonological developments is that certain speakers of Standard German who normally keep /ɛ:/ and /e:/ apart occasionally fail to make the distinction. But this is irrelevant, since it is a well-known fact that a normal (or indeed intense) intercourse with speakers who use different variants (in this case /e:/ in words with "long ä") may obviously result in occasional confusion or even in the acceptance of a specific variant.
We may then conclude that the vowel /ɛ:/ is the result of phonological developments and that its incidence and distribution reflect a complex process of linguistic levelling influenced by prescriptive tendencies. This phoneme is now preserved in some varieties of Standard German and, generally, not only as the name of the letter ä, but also as a means of distinguishing otherwise homophonous words like Ähre and Ehre, währen and wehren, zäh and Zeh, etc.

Conclusions
A critical analysis of the available material has shed light on the phonological history of various vocalic phonemes and in particular of /ɛ/ and /e/ as well as of /ɛ:/ and /e:/. The changes that affected the two pairs led to different results in the New High German "Schriftsprache". The developments connected with these vowels corroborate, among other things, the view that today's /ɛ:/ beside /e:/ in words with "long ä" (e. g. spät) is not an artificial vowel based on the spelling, but a historical variant with a phonological history behind it and that its incidence and distribution reflect a complex process of linguistic levelling influenced by prescriptive tendencies.