Agreement in Persian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.29.560Abstract
This article investigates agreement as a number marking mechanism in Persian. The mechanism differs from number marking on nominals in that with an inanimate plural subject, the SG verbal ending signals a collective conceptualization of the experience where the members of the group are considered together as a single unit. The PL ending, on the other hand, signals a distributive conceptualization where the entities are individuated; hence, they are considered to be dispersed over space, or distinct in sort or time. Autonomy - whether the entity is conceived of as governing the course of events or not - seems to underlie the choice between SG and PL.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2006-10-01
Issue
Section
Artikel/Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2006 Ahmad R. Lotfi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Agreement in Persian. (2006). Linguistik Online, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.29.560