Agreement in Persian

Authors

  • Ahmad R. Lotfi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.29.560

Abstract

This article investigates agreement as a number marking mechanism in Persian. The mechanism differs from number marking on nominals in that with an inanimate plural subject, the SG verbal ending signals a collective conceptualization of the experience where the members of the group are considered together as a single unit. The PL ending, on the other hand, signals a distributive conceptualization where the entities are individuated; hence, they are considered to be dispersed over space, or distinct in sort or time. Autonomy - whether the entity is conceived of as governing the course of events or not - seems to underlie the choice between SG and PL.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2006-10-01

Issue

Section

Artikel/Articles